Donald Trump has been on Iran’s assassination list since he ordered Qassem Soleimani turned into a crater in 2020. After Operation Midnight Hammer obliterated Iran’s nuclear program and Operation Epic Fury decimated its military and political leadership, the threats haven’t stopped — they’ve intensified. Banners at Khamenei’s funeral. Assassination plots flagged by Israeli intelligence. The regime that is losing a war it started is increasingly focused on killing the man leading the country that’s winning it.
Trump’s response to all of it is exactly what you’d expect from a man who has survived three assassination attempts and isn’t remotely interested in pretending otherwise: “I’ve left instructions — if anything happens, to just literally bomb them at levels that they’ve never seen before.”
Full stop. No diplomatic hedging. No carefully worded statement from the National Security Council. Just a direct, unambiguous promise that Iran’s leaders need to read very carefully before they make the worst decision in the history of their regime.
This is deterrence as it’s supposed to work. The entire logic of deterrence rests on making the cost of action so catastrophically clear that rational actors choose inaction. Trump has done in one sentence what thirty years of State Department communiqués failed to accomplish: he has made the consequences of killing an American president specific, credible, and personal.
NOW – Trump says Iran may kill him: "I may be gone too, because I'm their number one target."? pic.twitter.com/BZPcMvht3n
— James A Stamulis (@stamulis_james) July 10, 2026
“Bomb them at levels they’ve never seen before.” Iran has already seen quite a bit. Their nuclear sites are rubble. Their air defenses are gone. Their military leadership has been substantially reduced. Whatever comes next, in Trump’s own telling, would make all of that look like a warm-up. Whether that means conventional munitions delivered at unprecedented scale, or something else entirely, is a question Iran’s remaining leadership should think very carefully about.
The succession question is worth acknowledging plainly: if the unthinkable happened, the decision on what “levels they’ve never seen” actually means would fall to Vice President JD Vance. Pre-written instructions carry moral and political weight, but the Commander-in-Chief in that scenario makes the final call. Vance has been consistent on Iran throughout this conflict. Nobody should assume he would be more restrained than Trump.
Meanwhile, the security implications are real and not theoretical. Four years of Biden’s open border policy created a window for Iranian operatives to enter this country. The president’s last-minute switch from the new Air Force One to the existing aircraft at NATO is being read by many observers as a direct response to credible threat intelligence — and that reading is probably correct.
Iran is calling. Iran is begging for a deal. And Iran is simultaneously hanging assassination threat banners at its Supreme Leader’s funeral.
Only one of those things is new. The threats have been there for six years:
NOW – Trump says Iran may kill him: "I may be gone too, because I'm their number one target."? pic.twitter.com/BZPcMvht3n
— James A Stamulis (@stamulis_james) July 10, 2026
He’s right. But now, Trump is making sure Tehran understands the math hasn’t changed. If anything, it’s gotten considerably worse for them.
They should believe him. Three attempts in, he’s still here. The same cannot be said for Soleimani.
