Close Menu
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • CORRUPTION
  • ELECTIONS
  • LAW & COURT
  • POLICY & ISSUES

Is the Voting Rights Act Case Decided at SCOTUS? Former Trump Official Drops Hint

Fed-Up Hegseth Reads ‘Legacy Media’ the Riot Act For Constant Negativity Regarding Iran Operations

Sotomayor Suffers New Humiliation: Apologizing to Kavanaugh For Personal Attack

Facebook X (Twitter)
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • CORRUPTION
  • ELECTIONS
  • LAW & COURT
  • POLICY & ISSUES
USA JournalUSA Journal
Home»LAW & COURT»Is the Voting Rights Act Case Decided at SCOTUS? Former Trump Official Drops Hint

Is the Voting Rights Act Case Decided at SCOTUS? Former Trump Official Drops Hint

Jonathan DavisApril 16, 2026 LAW & COURT
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News

What’s the latest on the Supreme Court case concerning the Voting Rights Act? Specifically, where do things stand with Louisiana v. Callais, a case that could undermine the Voting Rights Act and potentially leave Democrats on edge? The national implications of this ruling are immense, as a decision to strike down the VRA could pave the way for Republican dominance throughout the South. Perhaps that’s why the Court seems to be delaying the release of its opinion.

Sean Spicer, who served for a while as press secretary during President Trump’s first term, told The Huddle that the opinion is finalized, but some justices are delaying their decisions to prevent redistricting. Does this mean, then, that the Voting Rights Act (VRA) will be struck down?

.@seanspicer Reporting on SCOTUS decision on voting rights: “I have been told by reliable sources that that decision is done and the minority is slow walking the dissent so that states do not have time to redistrict.” pic.twitter.com/K81LzH9W8E

— The Huddle (@theDChuddle) April 16, 2026

“I have been told by reliable sources that the decision is done and the minority is slow walking the dissent so that states do not have time to redistrict,” said Spicer.

So – did we win? Because we should. The Constitution specifically prohibits using race as a determining factor for anything in our society, and that includes racially-gerrymandered voting districts, which is what the VRA created in the 1960s to address…racism.

Specifically, the Callais case revolves around whether the creation of a majority-minority congressional district in Louisiana violates the 14th and 15th amendments. Seems like we’re on the verge of finding out.

Should the decision go our way, this is what we could be seeing in the very near future:

Democrats in South face wipeout if Supreme Court guts Voting Rights Act — NYT pic.twitter.com/goHof93AS3

— NewsWire (@NewsWire_US) October 15, 2025

There’s also this:

Democrats' chance of taking the House in 2026 have plummeted, while GOP chances have skyrocketed over the last 6 months…

Why?

1. Dems aren't keeping up with the pace they set in 2017 on the generic ballot.

2. GOP may be looking at big gains from mid-decade redistricting. pic.twitter.com/iauGwkTmp2

— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) October 15, 2025


Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!

Add as a preferred source on Google

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should Illegal Immigrants be Deported?*
This poll subscribes you to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe any time.


Get USA JOURNAL by email:
Powered by follow.it




Previous ArticleFed-Up Hegseth Reads ‘Legacy Media’ the Riot Act For Constant Negativity Regarding Iran Operations
  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • News & Politics
  • Sitemap
News and Politics
Trending News Videos
Conservative Hollywood Blog
© 2026 USA Journal.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

pixel