During last month’s State of the Union address, a moment clearly defined the Democratic Party, and not in a favorable way. This could be a pivotal moment in the upcoming midterm elections and may influence the Democratic Party’s fate in future election cycles.
President Trump made a straightforward request, asking Congress to stand if they agreed that the “first duty of the American government is to protect its citizens, not illegal aliens.” The Democrats chose not to stand, signaling to every American that the Democratic Party does not align with their interests. Instead, it appears that those Democrats favor illegal aliens, including individuals who are dangerous and violent.
President Trump asked Congress: “Stand if you agree: The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.”
Democrats did not stand.
This tells you everything you need to know.
— America (@america) February 25, 2026
Pathetic, bordering on treasonous.
In response, the Republican National Congressional Committee (NRCC) is transforming this significant moment into an advertisement aimed at more than two dozen vulnerable Democrats in the upcoming November elections:
“Not only did Democrats stay seated; they made a statement. Spineless, shameless, completely out of touch,” the ad says. “If they won’t stand up for America, they have no business leading it.”
Just brilliant. But to be honest, it’s an ad that wrote itself.
Democrats continue to support illegal immigrants. Today, the House voted to pass the Deporting Fraudsters Act, which simplifies the process of deporting noncitizens who defraud taxpayer-funded programs such as SNAP and Social Security.
Tonight, I voted to PASS the Deporting Fraudsters Act. ??
This bill cracks down on noncitizens who exploit taxpayer-funded programs like SNAP and Social Security, ensuring those who commit fraud are deemed deportable and inadmissible! pic.twitter.com/DmybjRMHJx
— Rep. David Kustoff (@RepDavidKustoff) March 18, 2026
This sensible legislation aims to safeguard American taxpayers and the citizens who depend on welfare programs, shielding them from misuse and unnecessary spending. Unsurprisingly, a majority of House Democrats opposed this measure.
House Dems vote against deporting people who commit welfare fraud
Lawmakers voted 231-186 to approve the Deporting Fraudsters Act, with 186 Democrats opposing the measure. https://t.co/qgYk8dWKA8
— John R Lott Jr. (@JohnRLottJr) March 18, 2026
The NRCC ad will target House Democrats in 28 districts, which includes four open seats in Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey (11), and Texas (09 and 35). Those vulnerable Democrats are Adam Gray (CA-13), Derek Tran (CA-45), Dave Min (CA-47), Darren Soto (FL-09), Jared Moskowitz (FL-23), Frank Mrvan (IN-01), Kristen McDonald Rivet (MI-08), Don Davis (NC-01), Nellie Pou (NJ-09), Gabe Vasquez (NM-02), Dina Titus (NV-01), Susie Lee (NV-03), Steven Horsford (NV-04), Tom Suozzi (NY-03), Laura Gillen (NY-04), Josh Riley (NY-19), Greg Landsman (OH-01), Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), Emilia Sykes (OH-13), Henry Cuellar (TX-28), Vicente Gonzalez (TX-34), Eugene Vindman (VA-07), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA-03).
Of them, the following also voted against deporting fraudsters: Darren Soto, Jared Moskowitz, Frank Mrvan, Nellie Pou, Dina Titus, Susie Lee, and Emilia Sykes.
It’s clear that Democrats prioritize illegal aliens over American citizens, just as they failed to support the American people during the State of the Union.
“When it mattered most, Democrats stayed seated. Every single voter in battleground districts will continue to be reminded of this moment when their Democrat representative stayed glued to their seat while they had the easy choice of standing for American citizens over criminal illegal immigrants,” said NRCC Spokesman Mike Marinella.
The State of the Union moment wasn’t just a coincidence; it served as a preview and a strategic window, thoughtfully orchestrated by the president. Democrats clearly demonstrated to the country their allies and their adversaries. They remained seated during that event and reinforced their positions through their votes now. The remaining question is whether voters in those battleground districts will align with their lead or, instead, decide to show them the door.
