For 46 long years, American hockey fans were told to wait their turn. To tip their caps. To accept second place behind our neighbors to the north.
On Sunday night, that wait ended.
Team USA didn’t just win — they took it. A 2–1 overtime dagger to the heart of Canada. Jack Hughes burying the golden goal. Connor Hellebuyck standing on his head, swatting away 41 of 42 shots like a man on a mission. No excuses. No asterisks. Just grit.
When the anthem played, it wasn’t background noise. It was a statement. The Stars and Stripes draped over sweat-soaked shoulders, ice shavings still clinging to the jerseys, gold medals hanging heavy around American necks.
It took 46 years for American men’s hockey to climb back to the top of the Olympic podium.
And within hours, parts of the media were scrambling to take the shine off it.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
Instead of leading with a historic U.S. victory — earned through discipline, sacrifice, and a once-in-a-generation performance in net — Newsweek chose to spotlight “controversy.” Not the gold medal. Not the anthem. Not the grind. “Rigged.”
Rather than break down the overtime execution or the goaltending clinic that carried Team USA across the line, the story zeroed in on a split-second “too many men on the ice” sequence and built its narrative around anonymous social media complaints.
That tells you something:
You don’t call TOO MANY MEN but you call a 4 minute double minor?!
RIGGED get out of here BYE. #CANvsUSA
— manda ? (@amxndareviews) February 22, 2026
RIGGED THERE WAS TOO MANY MEN ON THE ICE
— Made In Canada (@MadelnCanada) February 22, 2026
No formal protest. No overturned ruling. No league review exposing wrongdoing. No evidence of cheating.
Canada had a 5-on-3 power play and couldn’t capitalize. The United States won in overtime. That’s not scandal. That’s sport.
But instead of stating that plainly, Newsweek elevated scattered online frustration and treated it as though it carried institutional weight. Viral anger became the backbone of the story. Unverified accusations were positioned at the center of coverage about an American championship.
That isn’t neutral framing. That’s narrative selection.
And this didn’t start after the final buzzer.
The tone was being set before the puck even dropped. Twenty-four hours before the gold medal game, HuffPost was already publishing a piece casting suspicion on American pride itself — framing potential celebration less as achievement and more as something that needed to be scrutinized.
The headline: “There’s A Name For The Discomfort You’re Feeling Watching The Olympics Right Now.”
Even before Team USA had a chance to compete for gold, readers were being advised on how to navigate the complex feelings of cheering for their own nation. The article featured therapists who described patriotic pride as a form of “cognitive dissonance.” It cautioned about the “odd blend of excitement and unease” that might come with chanting “USA”:
“If waving the American flag or chanting ‘USA!’ makes us feel grossed out or ashamed, we can cheer for individual athletes.”
Before a single puck was dropped, HuffPost had already decided what the “real” story might be. Not the matchup. Not the skill. Not the stakes.
The optics.
Visible patriotism was treated as something that could become awkward. Potentially embarrassing. Something to brace for rather than celebrate. It didn’t respond to controversy — it anticipated it. It gently coached readers to second-guess their own pride before there was even a reason to.
Meanwhile, American players were sacrificing teeth, throwing their bodies in front of slap shots, and representing their country on the world stage.
On one side: discipline, grit, and risk.
On the other: prewritten skepticism.
One outlet primed its audience to doubt the integrity of a possible win. The other primed them to doubt the legitimacy of celebrating it.
Then the win happened.
And when President Donald Trump phoned into the locker room to congratulate the team, it wasn’t a political stunt — it was a celebratory moment. Joyful. Unscripted. Unmistakably American:
“Congratulations. That was an unbelievable game… You’re going to be proud of that game for 50 years.”
The players didn’t whisper. They shouted back.
They talked about the gold. They talked about the White House. They celebrated like men who knew exactly what they had accomplished — and who they represented.
No hedging. No apology tour. Just pride.
"This is all about our country right now. I love the USA… We're so proud to be Americans."
— Jack Hughes, @usahockey ?? pic.twitter.com/XI9tcdKein
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) February 22, 2026
That’s the divide.
Regular Americans watched a team earn a hard-fought victory. Newsweek saw a chance to amplify outside accusations and dress up social media noise as controversy. HuffPost found a lesson to teach about the supposed risks of chanting “USA.”
One side celebrated effort, discipline, and excellence. The other side hedged, qualified, and moralized.
The players didn’t apologize. They didn’t issue clarifications. They won.
HuffPost encouraged unease before the game was even played. Newsweek encouraged doubt after the final buzzer.
That isn’t random. It’s reflex.
When America wins, too much of the legacy press doesn’t lean into the achievement — it leans into suspicion. Anonymous outrage gets elevated. Frustration gets reframed as scandal. Patriotism gets analyzed like a symptom. Victory gets treated like it needs a footnote.
But the gold medal doesn’t come with a disclaimer. And the scoreboard doesn’t bend to narrative management.
The team earned it. The country celebrated it. That’s the story.
You can’t hate these divisive, anti-American left-wing media nutjobs enough.
