Close Menu
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • COURT
  • CONGRESS

Trump Responds After Two National Guardsmen Shot, Killed On Democrat DC’s Streets

‘Military’ Publication Tries Attacking Hegseth, And Boy Did It Backfire

Transportation’s Duffy Humiliates Liz Warren After She Complaints About Travel Etiquette

Facebook X (Twitter)
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • COURT
  • CONGRESS
USA JournalUSA Journal
Home»MILITARY»‘Military’ Publication Tries Attacking Hegseth, And Boy Did It Backfire

‘Military’ Publication Tries Attacking Hegseth, And Boy Did It Backfire

By Jonathan DavisNovember 26, 2025 MILITARY
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

On Tuesday, the Military Times published a piece on hazing and bullying within the armed forces — which, on the surface, may seem like serious issues that deserve real attention (but we’re training men and women for high-stress combat environments so…)

But instead of sticking to the facts or addressing legitimate concerns, the story strongly hints that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is somehow to blame. And why? Because Hegseth has been pushing for tougher training, reinstating strict fitness standards, and restoring an unapologetic warrior ethos to a military that’s spent years being softened by Pentagon bureaucrats and woke social engineers:

While hazing reports saw an upswing in 2024 after three years of steady decline, bullying complaints have been steadily increasing since 2020. https://t.co/41k3GRMlpF

— Military Times (@MilitaryTimes) November 25, 2025

Here’s part of what the ‘story’ says:

When the Pentagon’s top civilian Pete Hegseth told an auditorium full of generals and admirals at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, in September that he felt proscriptions against bullying and hazing were “undercutting commanders and [noncommissioned officers],” the military was already seeing a rise in complaints about these practices.

That’s according to a Defense Department report published in June and obtained by Military Times. The congressionally mandated report, which tracks the reporting and adjudication of hazing and bullying within the armed forces but does not include reports from boot camp and entry-level training, shows that while overall numbers remain small, the Marine Corps continues to be the greatest source of complaints among the services. It also shows that data collection on accountability actions for those found to have perpetrated hazing behaviors is inconsistent.

In fiscal 2024, the last year for which data is available, troops submitted 138 complaints of hazing, of which 31, or 22%, were substantiated. That’s up from 121 complaints and 29 substantiations the previous year. They also made 1,058 reports of bullying, of which 227, or 21%, were substantiated. That’s up from 932 bullying reports and 175 substantiations in fiscal 2023.

While hazing reports saw an upswing in 2024 after three years of steady decline, bullying complaints, both total and substantiated, have been steadily increasing since 2020.

Sharp readers have likely already spotted the flaw in this entire narrative — but if not, here it is: every data point and every report the Military Times cited comes from the Biden years.

Not Hegseth. Not Trump. Biden. And the Department of War’s Rapid Response team didn’t hesitate to highlight that inconvenient little detail:

FUN FACT: The “data” in this report is from FY24… the Biden-era DEI Pentagon. pic.twitter.com/SK6JpUgBpq

— DOW Rapid Response (@DOWResponse) November 26, 2025

Here are some more rather appropriate responses:

Its been 20 years since my rank was literally pounded into my collar bone. My blood rank will always be a proud moment for me.

— Beekeeping in Maine ? ? ? (@njhamlin) November 26, 2025

It isn’t hazing when you are being trained

High stress training in a controlled environment enables ability for high stress management in the field.

This is why veterans are veterans.

— coffee_dog (@JeffreyNei75931) November 26, 2025

No way you are in the military and "reporting" "bullying." https://t.co/JBSeKzjSaQ

— Landon Smith (@catecumenical) November 26, 2025

They know full well the data comes from the Biden era, yet they’re pinning the blame on Hegseth anyway. Hardly shocking. During the first 100 days of the Trump administration, guess which Cabinet secretary received 100% negative coverage?

Pete Hegseth.

Even after hitting enlistment goals and bringing back a sense of pride and purpose in the armed forces, the media still can’t force themselves to acknowledge a single positive thing about him. Their narrative comes first — reality is optional.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should Illegal Immigrants be Deported?*
This poll subscribes you to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe any time.




RSS Breaking News and Politics
  • Trump Responds After Two National Guardsmen Shot, Killed On Democrat DC’s Streets
  • ‘Military’ Publication Tries Attacking Hegseth, And Boy Did It Backfire
  • Transportation’s Duffy Humiliates Liz Warren After She Complaints About Travel Etiquette
  • It Might Be Time For Republicans To Hit the Panic Button On Tennessee House Race
  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • News & Politics
  • Sitemap
News and Politics
Trending News Videos
Conservative Hollywood Blog
© 2025 USA Journal.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

pixel