Close Menu

LOL: Epstein Files Expose ‘Brooklyn’s Barack,’ Dem. Gov. Pritzker

By Updated: NEWS COMMENTARY

The Epstein Files are shaping up to be the most politically defective hand grenade of the decade — a weapon that blows up in the face of anyone foolish enough to pull the pin. Every politician who’s tried to weaponize it has ended up covered in shrapnel. And yes, the Trump administration learned that lesson the hard way, too.

This isn’t a scandal anyone controls; it’s a boomerang. And sooner or later, it comes back to whoever throws it.

Now it’s the Democrats’ turn to grab the Epstein grenade — and they’re about to find out exactly why you should never demand something you’re not prepared to live with. After years of shouting for every scrap of Epstein-related material to be released, they’re about to learn the classic lesson: be careful what you wish for.

Because guess what? Democrats didn’t suddenly cut off contact with Epstein after his 2007 sex-crimes plea deal. Far from it. The paper trail shows they kept engaging with him for years. One email even links a Democrat fundraising group’s efforts on behalf of Hakeem Jeffries directly to Epstein — in 2013:

That little bombshell has also dragged back into the spotlight a revelation from nearly two years ago involving the Pritzker dynasty. One of the victims in the Epstein investigation identified a cousin of Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker — a detail the media politely stuffed under the rug at the time:

https://twitter.com/C_3C_3/status/199039550144790148

And it gets even worse for the Pritzker orbit. Tom Pritzker’s contact with Epstein didn’t just linger after the scandal — it continued all the way through at least 2016. One email chain shows JB’s cousin casually talking shop with Epstein about James Comey, Bill Clinton, and even disgraced fugitive financier Marc Rich:

So let’s review. The Pritzker family — the financial lifeblood of Democrat politics and the ruling dynasty in Illinois — maintained cozy contact with a convicted sex trafficker for years after his 2007 plea deal. Not whispers, not speculation — documented communication.

Democrat fundraising operatives even courted Epstein to help boost their candidates, including the man who now leads the House Democrat caucus and never misses a chance to lecture America about the “moral stain” of Epstein. The hypocrisy is almost too on-the-nose to parody.

This is exactly the kind of smug projection that keeps leaving Democrats squarely in the blast radius of the Epstein grenade. They threw it, they demanded it, they screamed for full exposure — and now the shrapnel is landing in their own backyard.

Let me make this prediction: Once the full trove comes out, we’re going to see plenty of embarrassing material — not just about donors and operatives, but about the political hangers-on who cozied up to Epstein on both sides of the aisle. That’s just the reality of how political ecosystems work. And remember: none of this stopped until Donald Trump’s first-term DOJ resurrected the case and finally brought Epstein — and later Ghislaine Maxwell — to justice. Democrats conveniently forget that part.

My bet? The embarrassment will land much harder on Democrats, simply because Epstein’s Rolodex was stacked with big-name left-leaning financiers, foundations, and social-circle elites. But I won’t be shocked if a few GOP stragglers show up too. Power attracts parasites.

What I don’t expect is a direct link to anyone with serious political clout today — because if that kind of smoking gun existed, it would’ve leaked years ago. The political appetite for taking Trump down has been bottomless; if there were anything truly damning, we’d all have known long before now.

The coming revelations will be messy, embarrassing, and politically inconvenient… but they won’t rewrite history.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should Illegal Immigrants be Deported?*
This poll subscribes you to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe any time.