The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to take up Watson v. Republican National Committee (RNC), a case that will determine whether mail-in ballots cast before Election Day can be counted if they arrive after the polls close.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court will take up the case of Watson v. Republican National Committee– which will decide if mail-in ballots received after Election Day can be counted.
At least 18 states allow this– including Nevada, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. pic.twitter.com/bpZXO4cTkU
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 10, 2025
As Chris “Law Dork” Geidner stated when he shared the news on his social media accounts on Monday: “…[I]t’s a big [case] over state laws allowing the counting of ballots cast by Election Day but received after then” – as well as whether or not federal election law supercedes state election laws.
The Center for Election Confidence stated in a post on X that it was part of the only amicus brief, alongside nonprofit organizations Honest Elections Project and Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE), supporting the Supreme Court’s decision to take up the case:
??VICTORY.
CEC, @Restoring_USA, and @HonestElections stood alone with the only amicus brief urging SCOTUS to take up Watson v. RNC to confirm that federal law requires ALL ballots to be turned in by Election Day.
Today, SCOTUS agreed to review this important case.
?Onward!…
— Center for Election Confidence (@voterconfidence) November 10, 2025
It comes in mens and womens and lets your friends know you're happy to express your views and don't care what anyone thinks! Cheers!
Harmeet Dhillon, an Assistant Attorney General, has focused on election integrity issues for years and has shared her insights: “Election Day means Election Day.”
? JUST IN: Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon is pushing to ensure mail-in ballots MUST be received on Election DAY to be counted. The case is about to be heard by the Supreme Court!
DHILLON: "Election Day means Election DAY! Stay tuned!"
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 10, 2025
The game is now afoot. This case – and another SCOTUS is reviewing regarding racially-gerrymandered voting districts – could be the two that break the Democrats’ stranglehold on ‘election irregularities.’
