One of the best follows on X right now is the brilliantly named @DataRepublican — a woman who actually does the work. She dives deep into numbers, cuts through the noise, and turns the left’s favorite talking points into statistical confetti. In an era of lazy “fact-checkers” and media spin, @DataRepublican is doing what real journalism used to: following the facts wherever they lead — even when it makes the left deeply uncomfortable.
She really did a bang-up job with this latest thread, but first, let me let her set it up for you:
?? MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution ??
This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call.
Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into… pic.twitter.com/XtinGt306o
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) November 9, 2025
MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution.
This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call.
Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn’t new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year.
But what’s not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as “a global anti-authoritarian movement,” connecting U.S. officials with “colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly.”
They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, “international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces,” and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism.
At what point does this become treason?
I strongly encourage you to read the entire thread and watch the video clips — seriously, don’t just skim them. What’s being shown is deeply unsettling. The people in these clips appear to be deliberately hiding their international communications and contacts from the sitting president of the United States — President Donald Trump.
Check this out:
Ro Tucci herself goes onto talk about bringing in international actors to assist with the color revolution. Their role is going to be “mobilizing around corruption” … what does that mean? pic.twitter.com/IyciS8BhJH
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) November 9, 2025
In that conversation, the speaker said, in part:
We don’t have to be intermediaries, either. We can bring in actors, or colleagues from around the world, that dealt with this directly, very specific issues (inaudible.) Whether that’s on tackling corruption or how to respond to corruption, mobilizing around corruption, we can bring those folks in, and kind of be those facilitators. And so, again, I think those coordinations and structures are just starting to take place.
Look, I’m not some tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorist — but when a group of disgruntled former USAID employees are chatting on Signal about “tackling corruption,” it’s more than a little disconcerting. It’s downright unsettling.
This doesn’t look like civic-minded reformers trying to make government better. It looks like Trump Derangement Syndrome gone operational — the bureaucracy mobilizing for battle against a duly elected president.
But wait, there’s more, as they say. This is the part that should really set your behind on fire:
The speaker says:
Lest you think it is harmless, they outright admit their goal is to create new “socio-political economic governance systems.”
If that’s not a coup, I don’t know what is. pic.twitter.com/45HWwzxfef
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) November 9, 2025
The foment of our current constitutional crisis is our opportunity to catalyze and synergize a dynamic change-making. A dynamic change, making fractal ecosystems capable of co-generating the emergence of the new (driving them together? Unclear) based social-political-economic governance systems. That is a long sentence.
DataRepublican adds in that tweet:
“Lest you think it is harmless, they outright admit their goal is to create new “socio-political economic governance systems.”
If that’s not a coup, I don’t know what is.
It’s a mouthful of a sentence — packed with so much bureaucratic jargon you could spread it on a biscuit. But once you scrape off the layers of buzzwords and self-importance, what you’re really looking at is a group of people quietly plotting to reshape “social-political-economic governance.” In plain English: they’re talking about reengineering the system to suit their own political goals.
And let’s be honest — what constitutional crisis? There isn’t one. President Trump was elected and inaugurated exactly as the Constitution prescribes. His cabinet secretaries and appointees were nominated and confirmed according to the same process. And every time some activist judge tried to kneecap his administration, Trump complied with the ruling and pursued the issue through the courts, just like every other law-abiding president.
Again, just to be clear, there is no constitutional crisis. But there will be, if people like these continue this behind-the-scenes BS.
You really need to read the whole thread. Watch the videos. We all really have to understand precisely what’s going on here.
