Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, drew criticism after saying on the “Getting Better” podcast with Jonathan Van Ness that committing a crime does not automatically make someone a criminal.
Crockett argued that intent and circumstances matter in defining criminality, stressing the importance of understanding the factors that drive unlawful behavior. A former public defender and civil rights attorney, she said her experience representing indigent clients shaped her perspective on how poverty, limited education, and systemic inequities can push people toward crime.
She added that these insights inform her legislative priorities on public safety, pointing to cases where people act out of necessity rather than malice. She said, “Just because someone has committed a crime doesn’t mean they are a criminal.”
PLAY:
Jasmine Crockett: "Just because someone has committed a crime, it doesn't make them a criminal. That is completely different. Being a criminal is more so about your mindset."pic.twitter.com/YkZYc7Hmtx
— Thomas Sowell Quotes (@ThomasSowell) September 19, 2025
Crockett said policymakers and the public should distinguish between opportunistic crimes and acts committed under duress or extreme need. She cited examples of low-level theft, such as stealing food or diapers, noting that Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot has argued such cases may not warrant prosecution. These situations, she said, often arise from urgent necessity rather than deliberate wrongdoing, a view shaped by her experience working with people facing systemic hardship.
Her remarks drew swift backlash from conservatives online. Commentator Gunther Eagleman called her statements “unbelievable” on X and questioned her qualifications, while others accused her of downplaying personal responsibility and the legal definition of criminality.
Drawing on her background as a public defender, Crockett questioned whether law enforcement should focus more on preventing crime or on addressing the systemic social challenges that contribute to it.
Observers said her comments highlight the ongoing tension between an empathy-driven approach to justice and more traditional punitive models.
Critics warn that defining criminality by mindset risks normalizing unlawful behavior, while supporters argue that examining root causes is essential to meaningful reform.
