Close Menu
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • CORRUPTION
  • ELECTIONS
  • LAW & COURT
  • POLICY & ISSUES

Seattle’s Socialist Mayor Orders Cops to ‘Track ICE’ – Cop Union’s Response Is A Thing of Beauty

Another Local Judge Lets Criminal Alien Out the Back Door – Is Another DOJ Arrest Coming

Red Alert In Texas, Republicans – And You’d Better Pay Attention

Facebook X (Twitter)
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • CORRUPTION
  • ELECTIONS
  • LAW & COURT
  • POLICY & ISSUES
USA JournalUSA Journal
Home»GOVERNMENT»House Considers Legislation To Rein In Lower Federal Courts

House Considers Legislation To Rein In Lower Federal Courts

Jonathan DavisMarch 25, 2025Updated:December 23, 2025 GOVERNMENT
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is striving to balance President Donald Trump’s demands to impeach federal judges who block his agenda with efforts to curb their power without risking politically hazardous removal votes. Under increasing pressure from the White House, Johnson has endorsed legislation that would restrict the reach of a district judge’s ruling if an injunction is imposed. For weeks, Trump and his allies have decried local judges’ ability to enforce measures—such as nationwide bans on deportations or the shutdown of government agencies—that they argue hinder the president’s objectives.

Introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), the proposed bill could offer Johnson a path forward without reinforcing the mainstream media’s narrative of an impending “constitutional crisis.” While the Trump administration has previously navigated around judicial decisions by citing technicalities or procedural errors, many reporters now speculate that the president might eventually ignore a federal court order—a claim he has consistently denied.

Issa’s bill, the “No Rogue Rulings Act,” seeks to bar federal judges from enacting nationwide injunctions. Speaker Johnson, a former constitutional attorney, supported the legislation on Tuesday. “We have a major malfunction in our federal judiciary, and practically every week, another judge casts aside the tradition of restraint from the bench and opts to be the Trump resistance in robes,” Issa said in a statement to NBC News.

The senior Judiciary Committee member added, “Our bill is the constitutional solution to a national problem, and that’s why it’s on a glide path to the House floor and to the Senate next.” Meanwhile, some House Republicans, including Reps. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) and Andy Ogles (R-TN), have introduced separate bills aiming to impeach individual judges—most notably, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who halted the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan illegal immigrants.

Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) expressed his support for Issa’s bill, describing it as a “good piece of legislation.” House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA), who manages the schedule for floor activities, announced on Monday that the bill will be brought up for a vote next week.

Add as a preferred source on Google

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should Illegal Immigrants be Deported?*
This poll subscribes you to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe any time.


Get USA JOURNAL by email:
Powered by follow.it




Previous ArticleFBI’s Patel Shoots Down Latest ‘Fake News’ Report From CNN
Next Article Trump Pulls Secret Service Detail From Impeached Biden Admin Official
  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • News & Politics
  • Sitemap
News and Politics
Trending News Videos
Conservative Hollywood Blog
© 2026 USA Journal.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

pixel