Close Menu
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • COURT
  • CONGRESS

Appeals Court Sides With Trump Admin Over Banning Associated Press

‘Maryland Man’ Deported To El Salvador Returning To Face Federal Charges

Patel Says FBI Has Located Fauci’s Personal Devices Used During COVID Pandemic

Facebook X (Twitter)
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • COURT
  • CONGRESS
USA JournalUSA Journal
Home»MEDIA»White House Reporters Already See Difference Between Visible Trump And ‘Invisible’ Biden

White House Reporters Already See Difference Between Visible Trump And ‘Invisible’ Biden

By Frank BJanuary 27, 2025Updated:January 27, 2025 MEDIA
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

Politico’s White House reporters highlighted the stark contrast on Saturday between the “invisible” and “shielded” former President Joe Biden and the “omnipresent” President Donald Trump. Since Trump’s inauguration last week, White House correspondent Eli Stokols and White House Bureau Chief Dasha Burns noted that Trump has delivered multiple speeches, made several policy announcements, and engaged extensively with reporters. The revelations are chilling, given questions about who was really running the country if Biden was so incapacitated.

Trump’s high-profile media presence marks a significant departure from the comparatively subdued approach of the Biden administration, Fox News reported, citing Politico. “Yes, Trump was eager to sign all those executive orders reversing Biden’s policies,” they wrote. “But the bigger flex for Trump, 78, was to contrast his accessibility, aptitude and activity with his predecessor, who was so often shielded from public view by aides wary of showcasing the 82-year-old’s growing limitations.”

“As fast as the movers changed out the White House furniture, the country went from an invisible president, unable to command the spotlight, to an omnipresent one who wants the public’s attention at all times,” they continued. One reporter referred to Trump’s pressers as a “free-for-all” for journalists after “four years of begging for access to the more cloistered Biden.”

“Although Biden did take questions from reporters here and there, his more informal exchanges with the press were sporadic and rarely lasted more than a few minutes. More often than not, he was out of view,” Politico reported. But there was one downside, the article noted, which was whether constant access to Trump and his points of view would almost be “too much for the media and public to absorb.”

“Within the press corps, there is some ambivalence about Trump’s firehose on blast,” they wrote. “The excitement about being able to ask the president about why he pardoned people convicted of vandalism, trespassing and violently attacking police officers, not to mention questions about everything from tariffs to TikTok, is tempered by the awareness that it is all, once again, too much. Too much to process and capture in real-time. Too much for the country to digest.”

On Sunday, Trump held a 20-minute media gaggle with reporters aboard Air Force One, covering topics such as TikTok and Greenland. He also took a jab at his predecessor, remarking that reporters now have “a little bit more access” than they did under Biden—”by like 5,000%.”

Should Illegal Immigrants be Deported?*
This poll subscribes you to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.






RSS Breaking News and Politics
  • Appeals Court Sides With Trump Admin Over Banning Associated Press
  • ‘Maryland Man’ Deported To El Salvador Returning To Face Federal Charges
  • Patel Says FBI Has Located Fauci’s Personal Devices Used During COVID Pandemic
  • Jobs Report for May Beats Expectations As Trump Economic Policies Take Hold
  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • News & Politics
  • Sitemap
Daily News and Politics
Trending News
Conservative Hollywood Blog
© 2025 USA Journal.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

pixel