The Mark Levin Show, one of the most influential conservative voices in the country, is going to continue for an extended period under a new deal that the “great one” has just signed. The No. 1 conservative talker, already the busiest in the business, will be adding another show to his lineup for Cumulus Media, the Washington Examiner reported.
Levin, 66, has been with Cumulus Media and Westwood One since 2007. Under the new deal, he will develop and host an all-new show for the network, his first-ever original content podcast series. “This has been my radio home for 23 years, and I am more excited than ever, especially during these tumultuous and historic times, to continue my relationship with my first-rate broadcast partners for many years to come,” Levin said in a statement.
“Mark is a powerful and influential voice with an incredible ability to establish strong relationships with his listeners while driving tremendous results for his advertising partners,” Collin Jones, president of Westwood One and executive vice president of Cumulus Media, said. “Mark has been dubbed ‘The Great One’ for his ability to concisely break down the day’s most significant topics, and we are thrilled to grow our partnership with him for years to come.”
Levin, a legal scholar and former Chief of Staff at the Reagan-era Justice Department, has long been a go-to voice for clear and insightful analysis on critical issues, ranging from the legal challenges faced by former President Donald Trump to the scandals surrounding President Joe Biden. Renowned for his incisive critique of liberal media biases, Levin has consistently exposed attempts to obscure President Biden’s cognitive struggles, a fact that the media only began to acknowledge following last Thursday’s presidential debate.
“I understand my obligation is to serve the millions of patriotic Americans in the audience. I am blessed to do what I do, and I am committed every day to providing [a] detailed analyses of current events along with historic context, commentary, and my in-depth perspectives to deliver the very best broadcasting I am able to share with our many listeners,” said Levin, who is in the Radio Hall of Fame.
Last month, after Trump publicly called on the U.S. Supreme Court to hear and potentially overturn his guilty verdict in Manhattan, Levin revealed a possible avenue to make that happen. Trump was convicted on 34 counts tied to so-called election interference after facing a barrage of charges from District Attorney Alvin Bragg. The charges revolve around an alleged scheme to conceal a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. The payment was meant to prevent her from disclosing a supposed 2006 affair with Trump before the 2016 election. The former president was set to appear in court on July 11th for sentencing but after the Supreme Court issued is presidential immunity ruling on Monday, sentencing has been pushed back to September.
“THE STATE OF NEW YORK SHOULD BE SUED IN THE SUPREME COURT,” wrote Levin on X. “New York prosecutors have sought and obtained civil and criminal judgments under unique New York laws against Donald Trump in New York courts before New York judges shortly before the Presidential election.
“Their purpose and the necessary effect of what they have done is to interfere in the forthcoming federal election by persuading voters in “swing states” not to cast ballots for ‘electors’ who would choose Trump to be President. The legal validity of these New York judgments has been challenged, but cannot be determined before the election,” Levin’s X post noted further.
“What New York has achieved (and what it will accomplish unless the Supreme Court takes prompt remedial action) is to make this and future federal Presidential elections chaotic and unpredictable. It subjects them to an aggressive attack on one candidate by a single partisan State choosing to weaponize its local laws and courts,” he added.
“States like Texas, Florida, Tennessee, North Dakota, Utah, and others that are strongly Republican could sue New York in an Original Action in the Supreme Court under the provision of federal law that authorizes actions in the Supreme Court if controversies between States (28 U.S.C. 1251(a)). They could seek, as relief, that New York be ordered to vacate the New York judgments against Trump,” he went on.
One state — Missouri — has since taken that course. The action was announced on Wednesday by state Attorney General Andrew Bailey.
Disclaimer: This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.