Close Menu

VP Vance Bodies CNN’s Kaitlin Collins Over Cringeworthy Question About Fallen Airman

GOVERNMENT

“You can’t hate CNN enough” – Reason Number 699.

The clip was built to go viral, and it did: CNN’s Kaitlan Collins confronting Vice President Vance about a Gold Star family allegedly denied benefits, Vance appearing to fumble the name. Liberal accounts ran it as proof the administration doesn’t care about its fallen. The trouble is that the question rested on a premise about how military benefits work, and the premise was false.

Here is the case at the center of it. Maj. John “Alex” Klinner, 33, was one of six airmen killed March 12 when their KC-135 tanker crashed in western Iraq while supporting Operation Epic Fury. He left a wife, Libby, and three young children. Collins framed it to Vance as a family unable to get benefits “because it has not been officially declared a war,” and asked whether he and the president would personally ensure they got everything owed.

Vance’s response — asking for the airman’s name so he could speak to specifics — was recut as callousness. But the substantive problem was Collins’, not his.

Start with the declaration-of-war claim, because it collapses on contact with history. The United States has not formally declared war since 1941. That did not stop service members in Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf, Iraq, or Afghanistan from receiving combat pay, hostile-fire pay, and combat-zone tax benefits across eight decades. A congressional declaration is simply not the switch that turns those benefits on. Building a national-television gotcha on the idea that it is means the question was wrong before the vice president opened his mouth.

There’s a second omitted fact that matters. According to the Air Force, Klinner was not killed by the enemy. CENTCOM stated the crash was not the result of hostile or friendly fire. He died, tragically, while deployed in support of combat operations — but the specific benefits his widow has flagged, hostile-fire and imminent-danger pay and the combat-zone exclusion, are the ones tied to enemy action. That distinction is the entire ballgame, and Collins’ framing skipped past it.

None of which means the family’s concern is fake, and this is where the honest version parts company with pure media-bashing. Libby Klinner says a casualty officer told her certain benefits weren’t available, and the Air Force has confirmed it is auditing her case to ensure she receives everything she’s entitled to. If an administrative error shortchanged a Gold Star widow raising three kids, it should be fixed immediately and without argument. There is no partisan side to that. Klinner deployed four times and logged more than 500 combat and combat-support hours; his family has earned every dollar and every ounce of patience.

But “fix a possible paperwork error” and “the administration is denying a dead airman’s family its benefits over a word” are different stories, and only one of them is true. Collins reached for the second because she and the network she works for are garbage actors doing anything they can to undermine President Trump and his administration. The airman’s widow deserved a real inquiry into her case. What she got was used as a prop.