USAJournal

The Right Views. The Right News.

VIEWS

A Blue Wave For the Midterms? Yeah, Not So Fast

Text size

The polling averages say Democrats are up seven or eight points nationally and the president’s approval sits in the high thirties. Take that seriously if you like. But there’s a second set of numbers running underneath this cycle, and it’s telling a story the generic ballot can’t account for: the institutional Democratic Party is running out of money, and the people who used to supply it have stopped picking up the phone.

Look at the balance sheets. The Clinton Foundation, which took in roughly $225 million in 2016, reported about $57 million the following year and has limped along near $49 million as recently as 2024. That is not a charity responding to changing needs. That is a business whose product was access, losing its supply. The model was never complicated — political power on one side, wealthy donors and foreign interests on the other, philanthropy as the pass-through — and when the power went away, so did the donors, immediately and permanently.

Joe Biden is running into the same wall from the other direction. His presidential library keeps missing its fundraising marks, with corporate and institutional givers discovering an unexpected wave of other priorities. Presidential libraries are the easiest money in American politics; they’re a receipt for future access as much as a monument. When that well runs dry, the market has rendered a judgment about whose calls will matter in five years.

Then there’s the DNC, which as of the end of July was sitting on about $16 million in cash against nearly $18 million in debt. This is after, coincidentally, the Trump administration shut down USAID, whom many believe simply funneled taxpayer dollars to Democrat-aligned groups, who then funneled to…you know who. The committee took out a record $15 million loan in 2025 and put its own Washington headquarters up as collateral to get it. Parties have pledged that building before, so spare me the word unprecedented. The point is the timing: a national committee mortgaging its own roof fourteen months before a midterm it’s supposedly cruising toward.

The infrastructure around the party is under the same strain. A federal grand jury charged the Southern Poverty Law Center in April with wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering, and prosecutors returned a superseding indictment in August. The organization pleads not guilty and will get its day in court. But this is the outfit that spent three decades appointing itself the national arbiter of who counts as an extremist, issuing lists that banks and payment processors and reporters treated as holy writ, now explaining its own books to a jury.

ActBlue, meanwhile, is under congressional investigation over whether its screening let illegal foreign contributions through; a committee report landed on September 16, a co-founder took the Fifth, and the platform calls the whole thing politically motivated. Perhaps. It is also the pipeline through which a substantial share of Democratic small-dollar money flows, and it is currently lawyered up.

Now set that beside what the party is becoming. In New York and Michigan, the activist left has been winning primaries outright, and the DSA wing is no longer a pressure group inside the coalition — it’s selecting nominees. Democrats in Michigan are endorsing the Republican. That is not what a party surging toward a wave election looks like. That is a coalition whose old financial architecture is under subpoena and whose new base is picking candidates the old base won’t vote for.

Which brings us back to that D+7. Generic ballot averages have missed the final result by four or more points in most cycles since 2006, and the misses have run in one direction — polls underestimated Trump’s support by better than two points across 2016, 2020, and 2024. Once is noise. Three times is a lean.

Here’s the simplest test available. Donors are the most self-interested people in American politics and they buy future influence for a living. They have looked at the same landscape the pollsters have and concluded it isn’t worth the check. Nobody mortgages headquarters from eight points ahead.







Jonathan Davis

Jonathan Davis is the editor-in-chief for USA Journal News.

Leave a Comment