President Trump gave a primetime speech in July and confirmed what Republicans have suspected for years now – there is massive voter fraud occurring in our country, and much, if not most, of it is taking place in Democrat-run states.
Of course, the libtard mainstream media and Democrats dismissed Trump’s revelations, which were evidence-based, not opinion-based, as false, misleading, and lies. Then this happened.
New Jersey admitted 6,600 noncitizens were on its voter rolls. Nearly 400 of them actually voted. Governor Sherrill refused to hand over the data to federal investigators. The DOJ sued to compel disclosure. And last Wednesday, Democrats got a big assist from one of Joe Biden’s DEI judicial hires: U.S. District Judge Zahid Quraishi dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice — meaning the DOJ can’t refile under the same legal theory.
Now let’s talk about who Zahid Quraishi is.
He is a Biden appointee. He has a documented donation history that leans into Democrats. He is the same judge who, in February 2026, accused the U.S. Attorney’s office in New Jersey of intentionally violating his immigration-related orders — saying it had “lost its credibility” and threatening to require sworn testimony from administration officials before every future immigration arrest. He previously said he would “not stand idly by” while what he characterized as government misconduct continued.
This is the man New Jersey’s voter roll case landed in front of. Coincidence? You make the call.
His actual legal reasoning — that New Jersey’s computerized voter registration list falls outside the scope of the Civil Rights Act of 1960’s inspection provision — should not survive appeal. The DOJ’s “expansive interpretation” of Title III, as Quraishi framed it, was rejected, but by a blatant judicial partisan. The Trump administration will almost certainly appeal. They will probably find a more receptive audience at the Third Circuit than they did at this particular district court.
Now, let’s be clear about what this ruling actually does in practice. It buys New Jersey time. It keeps the voter roll data out of federal hands for the foreseeable future. It prevents investigators from finding out whether the 6,600 confirmed noncitizen registrations are the tip of the iceberg or the bulk of it — which, given that New Jersey has had automatic voter registration since 2018 and Democratic Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s admission covered only a single year of data, is a question that cannot be honestly answered without access to the full database.
Sherrill called those 6,600 noncitizens “citizens of New Jersey” when explaining why she wouldn’t turn over their information. The IDEMIA software company contradicted her “software error” explanation by pointing out that state election officials manually approved those registrations. The DOJ set a deadline. Sherrill missed it. A judge Sherrill’s team argued before — appointed by the president who appointed Sherrill’s predecessor — dismissed the lawsuit.
And now, even Politico is admitting that, yeah, it’s pretty easy for non-citizens to game the system to vote in our elections:
Maybe it's time for commentators and politicians to stop scoffing at people worried about noncitizens voting in US elections. https://t.co/Q7tk87Um3O
— Brit Hume (@brithume) August 1, 2026
Even so, every other court that has considered the DOJ’s voter roll access theory has ruled against it, Quraishi noted — seventeen district courts and a federal appeals court. That’s a significant legal obstacle, and the Trump administration needs to find a different legal theory or a different vehicle to get this data.
Harmeet Dhillon said they’d get it anyway. She needs to find a way to make good on that.
The appeal clock is running. November is 97 days away. What’s in New Jersey’s voter rolls matters enormously — which is precisely why New Jersey is fighting so hard to keep them hidden.
