Close Menu
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • CORRUPTION
  • ELECTIONS
  • LAW & COURT
  • POLICY & ISSUES

Vance Destroys Indiana Republicans Over Potential Midterm Disaster: ‘We Warned You’

Former Trump ‘Fixer’ Michael Cohen Is Back and He Drops Bombshells On Letitia James, Alvin Bragg

ICE Op At Mexican Restaurant In Minn. Has Democrats Frothing At the Mouth

Facebook X (Twitter)
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • CORRUPTION
  • ELECTIONS
  • LAW & COURT
  • POLICY & ISSUES
USA JournalUSA Journal
Home»GOVERNMENT»Jonathan Turley rips Jack Smith’s Jan. 6 charges against Trump – Warns what happens next could wreck legal system

Jonathan Turley rips Jack Smith’s Jan. 6 charges against Trump – Warns what happens next could wreck legal system

Jonathan DavisAugust 3, 2023Updated:April 24, 2024 GOVERNMENT
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News

Georgetown law school professor Jonathan Turley destroyed special counsel Jack Smith’s filing of federal charges against former President Donald Trump for the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol Building.


OPINION: This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.


Turley warned that if Smith is successful, his prosecution will not only result in improperly finding Trump guilty but also destroying a tidal wave of legal precedent backed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

“This is a free speech-killing indictment. There’s no way around it,” he told Fox News host Sean Hannity (see video below).

“I write a great deal in academia in the free-speech area, and I have rarely seen a more chilling filing by the Department of Justice. The question that people have to ask themselves is, when is the price too high? People are obviously enraged, but what is the price too high to bag Donald Trump?” he said.

“This indictment is that prohibitive cost. Meaning, what they are attempting to do is criminalize what they consider to be disinformation,” Turley continued.

“And I have to tell you, this indictment is a really sad moment for me. I hoped that Smith is going to indict on January 6th, that he would find unassailable evidence and unquestioned legal authority. He has neither in this indictment,” he added.

“This is a speaking indictment, but it doesn’t say very much. It basically just says that we think Trump is lying and that he actually didn’t believe this. I can’t tell you how facetiously ridiculous this claim is,” he added.

“It starts up by saying, of course, you can say false things in the campaign, but then says that Trump knew they were false. Is that the test going forward in terms of criminalizing political speech?” Turley asked.

“Smith is just not only going to have to just bulldoze through the First Amendment, he’s going to have to bulldoze through a line of cases by the Supreme Court,” he said.

WATCH:

[videopress YyZ8MoEO]

Add as a preferred source on Google

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should Illegal Immigrants be Deported?*
This poll subscribes you to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe any time.


Get USA JOURNAL by email:
Powered by follow.it




Previous ArticleWATCH: Trump attorney brutally corrects CNN’s Kaitlin Collins – Embarasses her with cold, hard legal facts she didn’t expect
Next Article Alan Dershowitz makes huge prediction concerning Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment – Says he believes any conviction will eventually be overturned by SCOTUS
  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • News & Politics
  • Sitemap
News and Politics
Trending News Videos
Conservative Hollywood Blog
© 2026 USA Journal.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

pixel