Close Menu
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • COURT
  • CONGRESS

GLORIOUS: GOP Lawmaker Hands Hakeem Jeffries His Rear End In the Halls Of Congress

Nancy Pelosi Loses It So Badly Even CNN Had to Issue Several Corrections

Red State Launching Undercover Operations Against Antifa After Charlie Kirk Assassination

Facebook X (Twitter)
USA JournalUSA Journal
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • COURT
  • CONGRESS
USA JournalUSA Journal
Home»COURT»Federal Court Hands Devin Nunes Major Win Over MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow

Federal Court Hands Devin Nunes Major Win Over MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow

By Jonathan DavisNovember 29, 2022Updated:April 24, 2024 COURT
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

Former California GOP Rep. Devin Nunes got some great news from a federal court on Monday.

A federal judge in Manhattan ruled that Nunes’ defamation lawsuit against former MSNBC host Rachel Maddow can proceed.

The lawsuit makes reference to an allegation from Maddow that Nunes was a stooge for the Russian government. She said Nunes received a package from Andriy Derkach, a pro-Russia Ukrainian legislator, but Nunes “refused to hand it over to the FBI, which is what you should do if you get something from somebody who is sanctioned by the U.S. as a Russian agent.”

But in fact, one of Nunes’ aides at the time turned the package over to the FBI the day Nunes received it, unopened.

U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel rejected NBC’s claim that Maddow’s statements were either true or simple opinions and thus were protected speech under the First Amendment.

Castel said when Maddow said Nunes, who is now CEO of Trump Media and Technology Group, refused to give the package to the FBI, she was claiming a fact not making an opinion.

“The statement in this respect was false, not just technically but also in substance and meaning, and capable of injuring Nunes in his profession,” the judge noted in his ruling, while he dismissed Nunes’s claims that two other statements were defamatory.

Nunes “plausibly allege[d] actual malice,” Castel wrote.

The judge also said Maddow had no source for the Nunes’ story and while she may have known about a similar story in a Politico, “a court does not weigh competing, plausible theories of actual malice on a motion to dismiss.”

Nunes’ lawsuit seeks damages after arguing that MSNBC and Maddow knew that the package in question had been turned over to the FBI. However, the suit further argues that both “set out out to inflict maximum pain and suffering on plaintiff in order to harm plaintiff’s reputation.”

Former congressman and Donald Trump ally Devin Nunes has cleared an early hurdle in a lawsuit accusing MSNBC host Rachel Maddow of smearing him on her show https://t.co/KtEFYhiBT1

— Bloomberg (@business) November 29, 2022

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Should Illegal Immigrants be Deported?*
This poll subscribes you to our free newsletter. Unsubscribe any time.




RSS Breaking News and Politics
  • GLORIOUS: GOP Lawmaker Hands Hakeem Jeffries His Rear End In the Halls Of Congress
  • Nancy Pelosi Loses It So Badly Even CNN Had to Issue Several Corrections
  • Red State Launching Undercover Operations Against Antifa After Charlie Kirk Assassination
  • Kamala Harris Mocks Trump and His Supporters With Vile Term, Then White House Gets Payback
  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • News & Politics
  • Sitemap
News and Politics
Trending News Videos
Conservative Hollywood Blog
© 2025 USA Journal.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

pixel